Many people are interested in how Open Focus relates to Mindfulness. They feel these systems should somehow overlap since they both promote attention training to achieve similar goals – improving health and general well-being.
I had a short encounter with Mindfulness four years ago when I enrolled on a Mindfulness stress reduction course (MBSR). I found it slightly overwhelming with the amount of ‘homework’ I was to supposed to do but, in general, it was a good experience. Naturally, I am far from saying that I am a Mindfulness expert so I asked Sarah Gulland – a professional Mindfulness teacher – for help in writing this article. Sarah works from London, Guildford and Sussex. She came across Open Focus some time ago and she found it interesting enough to become an Open Focus trainer.
You can watch my webinar on this topic in The Membership Zone.
.
What is Mindfulness ?
In its most basic form, Mindfulness means to pay attention to what’s happening, on purpose, in the present moment and without judgement. Originally from buddhist roots it was introduced into the West by Dr Jon Kabat-Zinn and the University of Massachusetts. Since its appearance in the West around twenty years ago, many people have participated in the Mindfulness based stress reduction course. Research shows that participants may experience profound benefits such as reduced levels of stress, a greater sense of wellbeing, increased clarity and focus and improved sleeping patterns.
According to Dr Kabat-Zinn by paying attention in a certain way we can switch off so called autopilot on which we often go through live unaware of what’s happening within and around us. Living on autopilot not only means that we miss out on a lot of the richness of life, we are also more likely to be stressed. Stress and autopilot are linked because when we are on autopilot, we are much more likely to act out patterns of behaviour that aren’t helpful to us. In others words, we react instead of respond to challenging experiences in our life. Mindfulness helps us to become aware of these habitual patterns and gives us a choice to change how we relate to challenging experiences. It’s not about taking stress away or of hoping to live a life without any stress but fundamentally changing how we relate to what’s difficult.
On another hand many of us spend much of our time ‘living in our heads’. We live in a kind of virtual reality consisting of thoughts and inner dialogue. Thoughts tend to relate either to the past or future. Mindfulness helps us to learn how to come back to the present and to what’s actually happening rather than our perceptions of what’s happening which are often inaccurate. We practice it by cultivating greater somatic awareness, that is, awareness of the body because the body is always in the present moment.
Ultimately, the more we practice Mindfulness and observe the changing nature of experience, we may begin to sense that what we previously thought of as being tangible and solid, such as our sense of self, seems less distinct. We may begin to have experiences of what lies beyond objects arising in awareness such as sensations, thoughts and emotions. We may begin to experience awareness itself. This is an extremely significant moment in practice and life, when we start to experience ourselves as something greater than what we observe and our sense of being the observer.
In Mindfulness, attention generaly focuses on one object (such as the breath, sensations in the body, thoughts, or emotions), exploring it with a sense of curiosity and interest. Another way Mindfulness can be practiced is through Open Monitoring or Open Awareness, where no particular object of experience is selected and there is an openness to all that is unfolding within awareness. Here too, however, as various objects pass through awareness, attention is often paid to each object in a narrowly focused way.
.
What is Open Focus ?
Open Focus is the name of an attention training program created by Dr Lester Fehmi, neuroscientist and psychologist from Princeton, US. Dr Fehmi found that once our whole brain electric activity becomes more synchronous in alpha frequency, our mental and physical health improves. He created a series of mind exercises which help to cultivate this brain wave pattern and he designed a neuro-feedback EEG machine which can detect it.
On the basis of his findings, Dr Fehmi developed The Four Attention Styles theory. This theory describes four different styles we can pay attention and relates these styles to the brain physiology.
According to Dr Fehmi, pain, stress, anxiety and live’s challenges make our attention narrow and objective. It is natural to narrow our attention (to focus) on pain or a problem in order to deal with it efficiently but most people overuse this style in everyday life. They are unaware that it keeps them us in continuous “flight and fight’ mode (see this post). Moreover habitual focusing creates an impression that the reality consists of separated objects. It is because we can focus on only one thing or a sensation at the time leaving the rest outside of our focus. It can make us feel distant, alienated and lonely.
Dr Fehmi says, we can support ourselves in relating to what’s difficult in a more balanced, accepting way by diffusing (broadening, opening focus of) our attention. Diffusing allows us to see the big picture and connect (immerse) with its elements. It helps to realign with the world and to create healthy relationships. This style is linked to ‘rest and digest’ part of our physiology and makes the whole brain activity more synchronous in alpha frequency which can be confirmed by Dr Fehmi’s machine (see graph below).
Dr Fehmi suggests everyone should be flexible in paying attention. It means that you can alternate between ‘narrow and objective‘ and ‘diffused and immersed‘ styles of attention or balance all at the same time. Dr Fehmi says, that the way we pay attention is directly linked to our well-being. It means that once you are able to balance your attention you can positively influence your mind and body.
During Open Focus training we practise diffusing by becoming simultaneously aware of many objects. The object can be everything you can focus on like a physical object, a sound, a taste, a thought, a feeling, sensation from the body, etc. Then you can progress to awareness of space between objects (it might be space between physical objects, silence between sounds or breaks between thoughts, etc). Finally you become aware of space between and inside objects which according to Dr Fehmi helps us attending in ‘diffused and immersed‘ style. In this style of attending all objects (including you) dissolve in space and you immerse with reality becoming fully connected.
.
Are Mindfulness and Open Focus complementary ?
Open Focus and Mindfulness are not distinct and competing practices but rather highly complementary.
Mindfulness helps us to learn to pay attention to our experience and to notice how we are relating to this experience. Open Focus then builds upon the benefits and skills of Mindfulness by training us not just to pay attention but to be more aware of how we are paying attention and to be more flexible in our attention styles.
We then have the benefits of two complementary practices available to us; learning to pay attention and being flexible in how we pay attention. We could say that Mindfulness is an excellent foundation for Open Focus training and that Open Focus helps us to get the most from Mindfulness training.
.
What can Mindfulness offer Open Focus ?
Mindfulness practitioners develop attentional control, that is, the ability to direct their attention to a place of their choosing. This greatly helps to develop flexibility of attention in Open Focus.
In addition, many of the Open Focus exercises require the ability to have good somatic awareness or the ability to feel different parts of the body and to be aware of the senses. Mindfulness training cultivates good somatic awareness, making the Open Focus exercises more accessible and easier to work through.
More advanced Mindfulness practitioners may have already had experiences of what lies beyond experience as a separate self witnessing different objects in awareness. They may already feel familiar with ‘feeling into’ awareness itself. This can provide an excellent foundation for the diffused and immersed attention style in Open Focus, where the practitioner may experience of oneness – the dissolution of the self and connection with all that is. This experience can be disorienting and may provoke anxiety for some people and so again Mindfulness may provide a platform for these experiences to occur in Open Focus.
.
What can Open Focus offer Mindfulness ?
As it has been mentioned, a lot of Mindfulness practice is based on a narrow way of paying attention (that is, we are focused on one object as explained before). Although it is useful in helping us to be more aware of what is happening in the moment, overusing this style may lead to tightness and over-efforting in unexperienced practitioners. It is because many people think they have a choice of staying watchful (mindful) of what is happening or slip into daydreaming. They keep trying harder and it makes them exhausted and it sometimes leads to frustration and disappointment.
We therefore propose that Open Focus can bring to Mindfulness the idea of paying attention in the diffused style and the concept of attention flexibility.
Mindfulness practitioners who learn how to diffuse their attention may find that it helps them to progress. There are several reason for this:
⁃ the diffused attention style tends to quickly quieten down internal chatter. For example, it is sometimes enough to become aware of sensations coming from both hands and at the same time to sense peace and calmness of the mind. It is because synchronous alpha brain waves play top-down inhibitory role in the brain network. The quiet mind makes ‘observing without judgment’ a lot easier.
⁃ in the diffused attention style you do not redirect your attention from one object to another but you redistribute it between many objects which are attended at the same time. The only way to do it is to attend objects in a very soft (less rigid, relaxed) way. This skill can then be used in everyday life. For example, you can stay continuously aware of breathing whilst listening to someone talking to you and there is no struggle between competing objects in your awareness. It helps to continuously sense the present moment and it has very practical applications (see this post).
⁃ it is important to note that in the diffused attention style one of the objects you pay attention to could be your daydreaming. Including daydreaming into the diffused attention allows to reduce struggle with it during a practice. It is possible (and quite easy) to accept daydreaming as one of many objects you pay attention to (see this post). It can be easily extended to everyday life and it helps to stay present.
⁃ in order to become fully aware of the world, it can be helpful to cultivate a more diffused than focused attention style. Focused attention requires cutting off a lot of what is really happening around us and it restricts experience to a narrow stream of sensations. In the diffused attention style you are aware of the object and its background (see this post). This may broaden the perspective, helping to put things in context. It may also help to disable an autopilot and develop ability to respond as opposite to reacting.
⁃ as it was mentioned before Open Focus exercises cultivate an awareness of space around and inside objects. Once a practitioner is aware of space inside the object, it may become softer, lighter and easier to be with and observe, (for example when we attend an unwanted emotion). By switching to a diffused attention style, the difficulty may be diluted by a broader spectrum of attention. This could be likened to putting a teaspoon of salt in an egg cup filled with water and tasting it – the water would taste very salty. If the same teaspoon of salt was put in a swimming pool, it would be difficult to taste the salt. Mindfulness enables us to be aware that there is salt in the water, but Open Focus allows us to experience the salt in the context of the swimming pool rather than the egg cup!
⁃ the diffused and immersed attention style helps to dissolve objects like pain or unwanted feelings. Mindfulness practitioners are sometimes encouraged to bring attention to an ache in the back and to observe how this ache feels, exploring how it would be to allow the ache to be there. In Open Focus, they might feel the ache but at the same time feel the space around and in the ache together with the space in the room. In addition, they might imagine that we are part of the ache itself, allowing themselves to become immersed in the ache. This sometimes makes the pain or feeling softer, blurred with its background and then it may naturally and effortlessly dissolve. The dissolving pain and unwanted feelings process is well described in Dr Fehmi’s book.
.
Conclusion
Mindfulness teaches us to pay attention to our experience so that we can interrupt habitual patterns of relating to ourselves and the world that may not be helpful for us. Open Focus enhances Mindfulness practice by teaching us not just to pay attention, but to bring more awareness to how we are paying attention.
As this article has demonstrated, these are two highly complementary and mutually reinforcing practices. Ultimately, both may lead to an experience that when we learn to be present and learn to be flexible in how we are present, we may uncover an unlimited sense of peace and love that lies beneath the ‘noise’ that we are usually confronted with and try to suppress.
In scientific terms this may be regarded as homeostasis; in more spiritual language, this may be regarded as revealing our true nature or higher self. These practices may lead us to fulfil our personal and evolutionary potential and to live lives with grace and ease.
.
How you can try Mindfulness and Open Focus
We could write a lot but more about Mindfulness and Open Focus, but the best way to know them is to feel them!
You can try some good Mindfulness exercises here: Breathing into being, Taking in the good, Self compassion.
There is a choice of Open Focus exercises on Dr Fehmi’s and Tomasz’s website (the main difference is that most of Tomasz’s exercises are shorter and they are designed to introduce to diffusing and to bring a quick and noticeable experience).
.
Thank you for this Tomas .I find your website very helpful. I use mindfulness and open focus yo help manage cervical dystonia. An upside to this condition is that it has led to my exploring subjects like this.
Best wishes
Derek
Wonderful summary of how the two modalities are complementary. Inspires me to get back onto the double pronged Path with more consistency.
Very helpful article Tomasz! I greatly appreciate the time you have put into this. I am new to Open Focus but already it is answering many questions I have had. It seems to me to be a continual state of meditation – while we remain grounded and effective. I am looking forward to taking a deeper dive. Your articles and blog, and the clarity with which you write, has helped me enormously. All the best!
What a cracker, fantastically done Tomasz!
Thanks a lot, Thomasz, for your thorough explanations. As long term meditator in various traditions, mbsr-teacher and as being enthusiastic about open focus I appreciate your clarifications very much.
The Buddhist tradition – as far as I understand it – distinguishes concentration (focusing, narrow attention, calming down with one single object like the breath and after time immerse more and more into it, which leads to very blissful states) from mindfulness (open awareness).
In my understanding open awareness is not to let awareness hop around and focus here and there, but to become simultaneously aware of everything, which is here and now. That’s diffused attention. This is – in my view – not well understood in the mbsr-scene, especially because people do not know, how to do it. That’s why I find open focus so precious. It gives a structured and easy to follow way to broaden the attention. And including space is the magic key for me! So I teach it this way. And I love your exercises very much! Especially because you give clear instructions what to do, because you start with hands, lips and tongue, which are most easily to feel and because you do not start the “space-part” with space inside the body but with space around it, where I can feel more easily. It’s always a good pedagogical strategy to start with what is easier.
I have only some problems with the way you / Dr. Les Femi explain objective attention. Maybe I did not understand it right. But when in stress mode and not feeling connected, I do not perceive a me separate from the object. In fact there is no me at all, no awareness of my body etc., there is only the object. In this mode there cannot be connection or immersion, because there is no me, which could connect. As soon as I remember that I am here, I feel connected and immersed. So, for me self-awareness is the key to immersion and connection.
Hi Karin,
I agree, Open Monitoring seems similar to the diffused attention style.
I found a good explanation of OM in this article, (see link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693206/ ). It says, in Open Monitoring ‘One aims to remain only in the monitoring state, attentive moment by moment to anything that occurs in experience without focusing on any explicit object. To reach this state, the practitioner gradually reduces the focus on an explicit object in FA (focused attention), and the monitoring faculty is correspondingly emphasised’.
To be honest I relay on Sarah’s knowledge, experience and understanding of what Mindfulness is. I have a feeling most people do not link Mindfulness to Open Monitoring. You are right it might be one of the reasons why Open Focus may be helpful to Mindfulness practitioners.
I will ask Sarah to address your comment.
I would be very interesting to see your discussion.
xx
Now, regarding your question about the objective attention style.
This is interesting. When I am in a stress mode I am aware of my body trembling, my voice shaking and my larynx going into spasm. I am very aware of myself being filled with ‘bad energy’ which I learned to release by diffusing. I believe parts of my body which are being tense can represent and object and myself being aware of these parts is the other object. I believe that stress comes from this disconnection and is a synonym of separation, pain, problem, etc. As you know according to Dr Fehmi it is associated by alpha desynchronisation in the brain.
Connection happens to me when I feel relaxed and I let go a need of control usually loosing myself in reading, watching film, dancing, playing my DJ machine, loving my son and my wife.
In the narrow/immersed attention (watching a film or reading a book, or being in love) I can still be in stress. For example, when I am immersed with a main character of the book fighting against Dementors. I am bigger than myself but there is still the world outside of me I can be in conflict.
When connection happens in the diffused/immersed style (it happens usually when I intensify my OF exercising) I realise after exercise that it felt much shorter that it really was (and I was not daydreaming during it). I used to be very surprised looking at the watch after finishing the exercise not believing that time went so quickly. It comes rather with loosing self awareness, I must say. There is no me, here and now.
I wonder what you think.
Hi Tomasz!
Thank you very much for your explanations and the article on Open Monitoring. Very interesting.
It was a good idea to compare Mindfulness and Open Focus, because they are both attention trainings. And I find your article of very much value. I only did not agree with the statement in the chart, that the attention style of Mindfulness is mostly narrow. I admit, that it is often understood and practiced that way. But maybe Jon Kabat-Zinn, who created mbsr, has a different view, too.
You mention that he defined Mindfulness as a way of responding to life, which is: being fully aware of whatever is here & now in a non-judgmental way. That means: not grasping, what is pleasant; not fighting or rejecting, what is unpleasant; not ignoring, what is neutral. Just accepting everything the way it is. – This already reminds me very much of diffused / immersed attention style: You expand by simultaneously being aware of whatever is here and now and the acceptance promotes relaxation, connection, immersion and feelings of oneness.
Of course you are right: In mbsr there is not this clear understanding of different attention styles, and most people do not pay much attention to how they are paying attention as in OF.
Mindfulness as Jon defined it is very beneficial but not the normal state of consciousness for most people in the West. So he created a specific training. Now you can compare the techniques with Open focus exercises.
In mbsr the first important exercise – as you may remember of your training – is the body scan, where you mindfully move through body parts. Here you pick the people up, where they mostly are: in narrow attention. So you start with focusing on tiny parts like a toe. But during the exercise you move on to bigger parts like legs and arms and finally feel the whole body. I think Jon Kabat-Zinn even adds space in his exercise. (In Tibetan Buddhism you find many “spacy” teachings on rigpa or dzogchen.) So you broaden / expand / diffuse the attention during the exercise.
The main exercise in mbsr is sitting meditation, which is done in 5 phases. Again, you are right. Mbsr starts with narrowly focusing on the breath. Then becoming aware of the whole body, where diffusion of bodily sensations can take place. Next comes hearing and thinking. In these phases, people are definitely not in Being-Mode, as Jon sometimes called Mindfulness as well, but in Doing-Mode: They are directing their attention to calm and stabilize the mind. This is fine, too. But is this already Mindfulness as Jon defines it? I don’t think so. For me it is a preparation for the last phase, which the article called Open Monitoring and which reminds me of diffused immersed attention style.
In comparison I have to admit, that I personally find Open focus exercises more effective in leading more quickly to diffused and immersed attention style. And Open Focus is backed with findings in neuro-feedback, especially on synchronisation of the brain. This I find VERY interesting. I think, that’s the reason, why you emphasize so much on feeling hands, lips and tongue, because – as you surely know – the sensory representation of these body-parts occupy large parts of the brain. So by feeling them simultaneously you synchronize large parts of the brain right from the beginning.
I hope, you or Sarah did not feel criticized or wronged. It is just my personal view, that I equate (pure) Mindfulness with immersed / diffused attention style.
Thank you for the good work you are doing to change the life of people to the better!
Warm regards
Karin
Hi Tomasz,
Thank you very much for explaining objective attention style and sharing your experiences, although this blog post may not be the right place to discuss this issue.
What I understood from what you write, is that in a stress mode you experience stress symptoms apart from yourself. That’s narrow objective attention and – according to Dr. Fehmi – the normal attention style for people in the modern West. From time to time you immerse and connect, what can easiest be done with pleasant experiences like being together with loved ones or doing things you like. I assume, this heals the split between you and the world, brings recreation and flexible attention and it prevents overdoing narrow objective attention style.
After thinking this issue over and over again and examining my experiences, I now came to the conclusion that narrow objective is NOT my normal attention style, but narrow immersed. And that causes much suffering. (You say, that in narrow immersion, there can be stress, too, and I am curious how synchronic the brain works in narrow immersed attention style.)
You see, in stress mode I experience ONLY the stress symptoms. In pain the whole world exists of pain. There is no safe haven, no me apart from the pain. When hearing unpleasant noise, there is no observer, no witness, no me left, but only noise. When being together with certain people, they can easily dump and fill me up with bad energy or negative emotions.
I don’t think, this is due to some kind of mental illness or depersonalization, because I present a consistent persona to the world. I know myself and what I want. And I am capable to persist and follow through for decades.
In fact I guess that for about 20% of the population the normal attention style is narrow immersed. I think it because of what people say, what I observe and how they feel, when I tune in. Some people just feel more open, can easily identify with others etc. And those people are – in my view – very prone to stress, burn-out and exhaustion. Have you made similar observations, perhaps when seeing clients?
For those people – or maybe only for me, if I am the only one, whose attention functions that way – it is not a good advice to immerse in pleasant experiences for recreation, because they already overdo this attention style. So it might be better to follow certain teachings of spiritual psychology: Don’t identify, let everything come and go, just witness, become the observer.
And of course to diffuse. That brings the greatest relief, I agree. So thanks for sharing your experiences with diffused immersed attention style. Yes, something happens with the perception of time. For me during the experience time stands still. It feels like eternity. One eternal now. But afterwards and in retrospect I can too be surprised that time went so quickly. Maybe because nothing happens in this eternal now. You say “it comes rather with loosing self-awareness. … There is no me.” Maybe self-awareness was not the right word to use in my first post. English is not my native language. In your article you distinguished the normal me from a bigger one, awareness itself. That’s what I wanted to refer to. There is one space, vast, endless and eternal. And it is aware …
Thanks for making these experiences accessible!
Warm regards
Karin
Hi Karin,
Wow, I really like the last sentence of your second entry.
There is a lot space in it :)
I may be wrong but I think what you are referring to is daydreaming. At least this is how it sounds when you say ‘that narrow objective is NOT my normal attention style, but narrow immersed’ and ‘for about 20% of the population the normal attention style is narrow immersed’.
I understand by daydreaming losing yourself in the inner head world when you are living through past events or imagine the future. This can trigger various emotions and the external world seems to disappear.
I believe, we daydream being in the narrow/immersed attention style because it comes effortlessly and it distorts sense of time. I would also say that daydreaming is a default state of mind mostly because it happens effortlessly. It is like a neural gear in a car. An alert/watchful thinking requires a lot more energy and needs to be regulary interrupted by daydreaming in order to rest.
I think, most people continuously alternate between the narrow/immersed attention style (NI) and the narrow/objective attention style (NO).
You can notice it watching people waiting in a queue. They daydream being absorbed by their inner head words (or a smart phones screens) (NI) and wake up for short moments to check what progress they made in the queue (NO). You can observe that in other places: trains, waiting rooms, bus stops, people smoking cigarettes or eating on their own.
You can also witness it observing someone who reads a text book trying to memorise something (when studying for exams, for example). Active reading (NO) is when they load a new information from the text. This is alternated with moments when they integrate a new information with this what they already know (NI).
You can also watch it observing someone’s eyes when listing to her/his story. They look at you when they describe you a situation they experienced (NO) but every now and then, they move they eyes somewhere else (NI). It helps them to access another bit of they memories.
The problems start when people loose access to daydreaming (NI). It happens when someone has a problem (a worry, anxiety, etc.) which causes a tension in the body (which represents alpha asynchrony in the brain). Every time when s/he tries to daydream the tension in the body reminds them that something is wrong and s/he immediately starts thinking/analysing the problem again (NO). This clip explains it a bit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mysXnvotgc.
This situation requires a continuous supply of energy and it makes people tired. It is like driving a car constantly pressing accelerator. After some time, when problem is still not solved or they are still anxious they feel drained, exhausted and they are unable to get out of the bed in the morning. And it leads to depression.
So, ‘going through a difficult time in life’ really means loosing and access to effortless day dreaming (NI). They say, ‘they cannot enjoy life any more’ which means they cannot immerse with life because they are stuck in continuous NO.
I also think the famous ‘autopilot’, so often mentioned in Mindfulness literature, describes the situation when someone reacts staying in the narrow/immersed style of attention. It is because when your daydreaming time is interrupted and you are supposed act on something, your behaviour is often determined by the need to release quickly growing tension which feels uncomfortable. I do not want to go into detail here to not make this reply too long. Please, let me know if you want me to write more about this.
x
From this what you are describing, it seems that at the beginning of Mindfulness training people try to develop narrow immerse/objective flexibility (see, the attention styles graph above).
It is because after some time of Mindfulness training, they are able to effortlessly (NI) observe (NO) they breathing. Then, they are taught to broaden their attention (diffuse) in hope that they develop ability to attend in the diffused immersed attention style (Open Monitoring).
In Open Focus, practitioners start from practicing flexibility between narrow/diffuse objective attention style (again look at the graph).
It makes a difference because the diffused/objective attention style switches off day dreaming (it is hard to diffuse and daydream at the same time). Hence there is less straggle with unwanted daydreaming during a practice. This is possibly the reason why you say that you prefer OF exercises.
I must say, that staying aware of space is tricky for many. Space has no features for the mind to observe and analyse. Space has no colour, no taste, no smell, no texture etc.
So, how can you know you are aware of space when you have no means to detect it ?
I found that the easiest way to stay aware of space is to assume that whatever I am detecting (focusing on) cannot be space and I should let it go.
Say, when I notice a feeling I immediately drop it and I let my attention diffuse again. During a formal practice I do it many times until I become aware evenly of everything and nothing. I let go, then diffuse, again and again. So the diffusing bit (from the diffused/immersed attention style) is done actively. Immersing happens on its own.
I hope it makes sense for you.
I know, I have not addressed everything from your post but I will try to write more tomorrow.
Please, feel free do disagree :)
Warm Regards,
Tomasz
I think it’s really valuable to have a dialogue around these issues in order to clarify what mindfulness is and to raise awareness of how Open Focus and mindfulness can compliment one another. Karin, I totally agree that mindfulness should culminate in open awareness. The article refers to what can be the common experience of mindfulness practitioners which is a more narrow/objective style. This common experience arises from the fact that as you say, open awareness it not often understood by mindfulness teachers and practitioners and instead of being diffuse simultaneous awareness is awareness of multiple objects in a narrow, successive way. I agree that Open Focus is a really good and accessible way to introduce a truly diffuse attention style to mindfulness practitioners.
Thanks for your comments Karin- greatly appreciated!
Sarah
Thanks, Sarah, for your appreciative response. And thanks, Thomasz, for new insights and being open to my disagreement. :o)
I understand your description of daydreaming and agree: This happens in narrow immersed (NI) attention style. And I too have observed many people sleeping with eyes open – not aware of their surroundings, not aware of what is going on in their body. And in their mind, too, because, when you wake them up and ask: “What have you been thinking about?” they often don’t know.
I have read, too, that this is the default state of mind. It can be done to digest new information or experiences, yes. But I think, all too often people are thinking the same thoughts over and over and over again. And all too often these thoughts make them unhappy and rigidifies a negative world view. So, in my view the autopilot wastes life and it might be a good idea to wake people up. You see I don’t see daydreaming as positive as you do …
Furthermore for me daydreaming is not really effortless. Sometimes I am totally relaxed in immersed diffused attention style. Then a thought may come up on itself. And even, if it is not charged by emotions, I perceive a tiny contraction in the body. Not a muscular tension or so. Just a slight contraction in the fasciae. I think, whenever attention narrows there is a contraction somewhere which costs energy.
Of course you are right: alert watchful thinking requires much more energy.
And the most energy is consumed by compulsive thinking, charged by emotional reaction and accompanied by unconscious muscular tension. I am referring here to what you say about people having difficult times. I have read that this obsessive thinking and the tension can be a means to avoid feeling the emotion behind it. Maybe caused by a trauma, which couldn’t be processed, when it occurred. So it is stored in the body as unconscious tension. And whenever a similar situation triggers the trauma, people avoid the emotion and go into their head. But that doesn’t solve the problem. So it is a good idea to put them into their body again and let them experience the emotion behind it, so that it can dissolve. Here open focus anxiety exercises may do a good job, I think.
So we have three types of thinking modes: daydreaming, alert watchful thinking and thinking, which is driven by emotional charge, e.g. anxious thinking. Now you say, the latter two are done in narrow objective (NO) attention style, if I understood you right. And that is not true for me. For example when I read a book, I am normally totally absorbed in it. I am not aware of myself, the focus is narrowed on the words. So I cannot perceive me, the reader, apart from the reading. There is no separation between me and the reading. And that’s immersion. The same with compulsive thinking.
And the same with focused attention meditation, say on the breath. Yes, beginners usually alternate between daydreaming and watching the breath. Now you say the latter occurs in NO. Again, that is not true for me. The sentences we build in our language may be misleading. When you say: “I watch my breath.” There is I, the subject, doing something about an object, the breath. So this suggests that there is a separation between the I and the breath. That’s how I understand Dr. Fehmi describing objective attention style. I’ve read the passages in his book again and again. I can understand them intellectually. They sound so logic. But I don’t find them in my experiences, which can only be described in verbs like “breathing occurs”. Or even better: “becoming aware of breathing”. And I find this state of mind much more pleasant, restful and recreative than daydreaming.
In the last paragraphs you are talking about space and thinking. Here I agree. Diffusing quiets the mind. Daydreaming stops. Sometimes thinking on purpose can be done. For me thinking has a strong pull to narrow the attention. And the first step to withstand this pull is to become aware that thinking occurs, observe thinking.
Thanks for your explanation how diffusion takes place and how you do it. Yes, this makes sense and helps. I have not been aware that diffusion is done actively by letting go. For me it was more a shift of awareness from the phenomena to the space where the phenomena are occurring in. But, yes, there is a doing behind it.
Warm regards
Karin
Hi Karen,
You say ‘So we have three types of thinking modes: daydreaming, alert watchful thinking and thinking, which is driven by emotional charge, e.g. anxious thinking. ‘
If I want to assign an attention style to each type of thinking modes I would say that
– daydreaming (mind wandering) relates to – the narrow/immersed attention style (NI)
– alert, watchful thinking relates to – the narrow/objective attention style (NO)
– anxious, compulsive thinking describes the situation when NI is frequently alternated by NO.
The tension inside body during anxiety not only influences the theme of thinking but also frequently takes a person away from NI. They are in NO for some time before they can immerse again (NI) being for example distracted by a call from a friend. So, I think, people who struggle with anxiety spend in NO a lot more time then others hence exhaustion and inability to enjoy.
I think an attention styles interplay is different during Mindfulness training. (I mentioned about it in my previous entry). I think what is really practiced at the beginning of the training is a balance between NO and NI (ability to attend in both styles simultaneously).
Balancing NO and NI gives an ability to ‘observe the breath’ (which would be NO component) and ‘being the breath’ (which sounds like NI). These both styles can mix very well together.
You also say ‘And I find this state of mind much more pleasant, restful and recreative than daydreaming.’ I believe the reason for that is that during a session the quality of your immersion is better and lasts longer (without interruption for NO) than in your regular life.
You also say ‘For me thinking has a strong pull to narrow the attention. And the first step to withstand this pull is to become aware that thinking occurs, observe thinking.’ I believe you are describing your practice.
I would suggest that once you notice you daydream (NI) during a practice you have two options.
Option 1. Stop it and redirect your narrow focus to something else (etc breathing) and keep practicing simultaneous attending in NI and NO (similarly you could let your thoughts go but being slightly more aware of them which would be balancing NI and NO as well).
Option 2. You can open your focus and become aware of thinking and your breathing and other sensations at the same time. In this option you practice attending in the diffused/objective attention style (DO). As I mentioned before this style brings a noticeable change and it easy to notice your are a lot more than your thoughts.
Warm Regards,
Tomasz
Hi Tomasz,
thank you for “translating” my observations in Open Focus language. It never came to my mind, that NO and NI can mix together, but it makes sense. I only want to add that practice may not only improve the quality of the immersion, but it also enhances awareness and helps to lead a conscious life.
Warm Regards
Karin
Here is a great description of concentration versus mindfulness (by Bhante Henepola Guanaratana from https://www.vipassana.co.uk).
It says:
Concentration is narrow attention (focused)
Mindfulness is broad attention (diffused)
Vipassana meditation is based on balancing both styles.
xxx
Vipassana meditation is something of a mental balancing act. You are going to be cultivating two separate qualities of the mind – mindfulness and concentration. Ideally these two work together as a team. They pull in tandem, so to speak. Therefore it is important to cultivate them side-by-side and in a balanced manner. If one of the factors is strengthened at the expense of the other, the balance of the mind is lost and meditation impossible.
Concentration and mindfulness are distinctly different functions. They each have their role to play in meditation, and the relationship between them is definite and delicate. Concentration is often called one-pointedness of mind. It consists of forcing the mind to remain on one static point. Please note the word FORCE. Concentration is pretty much a forced type of activity. It can be developed by force, by sheer unremitting willpower. And once developed, it retains some of that forced flavor. Mindfulness, on the other hand, is a delicate function leading to refined sensibilities. These two are partners in the job of meditation. Mindfulness is the sensitive one. He notices things. Concentration provides the power. He keeps the attention pinned down to one item. Ideally, mindfulness is in this relationship. Mindfulness picks the objects of attention, and notices when the attention has gone astray. Concentration does the actual work of holding the attention steady on that chosen object. If either of these partners is weak, your meditation goes astray.
…
You can see full text here – https://www.vipassana.co.uk/meditation/mindfulness_in_plain_english_16.php
This is so completely off. Whoever who think mindfulness is just focused. Mindfulness is to be aware of your thoughts. Creating more awareness. So that instead of reacting you’re responding. You’ve got attention exercise and mindfulness mixed up. Being mindful of what of what you’re doing is being aware. Open focus is not wrong but its mindfulness. This is what happen when people try to be experts and don’t seek a guru. This is why people go crazy doing meditation because they start making mistakes and coming up with their own theories. Being aware of how youre working how youre reacting how you are doing everything in general is awareness which is mindfullness. Being so focused without being aware how or what youre focused on is called attachment. When youre not mindful of the things youre doing and how youre doing it youre clueless. What you perceive of open focus is mindfulness itself. The word itself open focus is absolutely rubbish and wrong. You canot open focus. What is opened cannot be focused. Focused is every force of attention being put together. Absolutely garbage. You should send this article to a yogi or a guru. Scientists have been coming up with wrong theories because of how they perceive things in general. Now Scientists wants to get into yoga haha. If your perception is wrong no matter what you touch no matter how pure. The wrong perception will corrupt it
HI Anonymous,
The easy way to create more awareness is to diffuse an attention.
Once you diffuse your attention you will see that awareness just happens to you and you cannot be not aware. The only problem is that with fully diffused attention you are not able to do anything because in order to do you need to focus (otherwise you can make mistake).
So, focusing is doing and diffusing is being aware (being mindful).
If someone wants to be able to do something and stay aware at the same time one can stay focused (doing) and gently diffuse an attention at the same time (being mindful, being aware).
In that way one will be in Open Focus.
It is possible and actually quite easy, and this is what the article suggests.
It can get a bit more complicated if you include all four styles of attention into discussion, but I hope this helps a bit.
Please, let me know if it does not :)
Very nice and clear Tomasz. I think the combination of Mindfulness and Open Focus can be a powerful and synergetic approach. I have several questions for you.
I am a retired guy whose funds are limited but time is not. I have read the book Open Focus and got the audible edition as well. I have started the meditations voiced by Dr. Fehmi, but am wondering if getting an EEG device would be warranted. I understand that the device shows the brain frequency and that moving into alpha or theta is the goal. But to achieve synchrony as I understand it, the brain has to be in phase. So does that mean I need a device with multiple channels? What key parts of the brain need to show that?
Approximately, how long would it take doing daily mindfulness meditations with the Open Focus meditations (20 Minutes per day) to achieve alpha synchrony with and without a device?
Thank you so much for your work and insights